Join Our Team

Enter Your Details

Your Name (required)

Your Email (required)

Phone No (required)

Location(required)

Post Applying For(required)

Attach Resume

Subject

Your Message

Latest Posts

Delay in informing insurance company about the loss. Claim liable to be rejected. Full Bench of the Supreme Court ruled on dated 21.08.18. Om Prakash 2017 -SC- differentiated.
November 13, 2018
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.1217-1218 OF 2017
Bail- NDPS- Commercial quantity- Bar of section 37 held to be discriminatory, irrational and unreasonable- and thus not worth defeating the right of the petitioner to get bail- However, application of mind on requirement of ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in
November 13, 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** CRM-M-30643 of 2018 (O&M)
Divorce by mutual consent – Waiting Period of 6 months mentioned in Section 13B(2) is not mandatory but directory- Supreme Court-
November 13, 2018
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Before:- Adarsh Kumar Goel and Uday Umesh Lalit, JJ.
In a mixture/solution of neutral or Non-psychotropic substance and the narcotic/psychotropic substance-quantity of only Narcotic/psychotropic substance is to be counted for commercial quantity-neutral/other-not to be counted
February 17, 2018
CRM-M-35080-2018 1 Sr. No.269 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Bail- NDPS- Commercial quantity- Bar of section 37 held to be discriminatory, irrational and unreasonable- and thus not worth defeating the right of the petitioner to get bail- However, application of mind on requirement of ‘satisfaction’ as mentioned in section 37 is mandatory- PH High Court- 09.08.18-
February 17, 2018
The travel of mankind, in its existential terms, have been from “Might is Right” to a